Editorial cover on EvalScribe cream reading "Minnesota TDE, by the numbers," with three cards showing the state-model component weightings (45% teacher practice, 35% student learning, 20% student engagement), and a subhead on the three-year cycle and where AI helps with the write-up, tagged for Minnesota principals and evaluators.

How can AI help Minnesota evaluators write teacher evaluations?

August 02, 2026

Custom HTML/CSS/JavaScript

Minnesota teacher evaluation Teacher Development and Evaluation TDE Minnesota MDE teacher evaluation Minnesota Statutes 122A.40 122A.41 Danielson Framework Minnesota Standards of Effective Practice Minnesota Rules 8710.2000 local TDE model state TDE model AI for Minnesota teacher evaluation Minnesota classroom observation teacher practice student engagement student learning 35 percent student growth Minnesota peer review peer coaching three levels of performance what is TDE Minnesota how does Minnesota teacher evaluation work what are the Minnesota teacher evaluation components how much of Minnesota evaluation is student growth best AI tool for Minnesota teacher evaluations ai for minnesota teacher evaluations minnesota teacher evaluation teacher development and evaluation TDE minnesota minnesota TDE components how much of minnesota evaluation is student growth 35 percent student growth minnesota minnesota standards of effective practice minnesota rules 8710.2000 minnesota statutes 122A.40 danielson framework minnesota three year evaluation cycle peer review teacher evaluation individual growth and development plan state TDE model vs local plan best AI tool for minnesota teacher evaluations is AI teacher feedback defensible how does minnesota teacher evaluation work

Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.

Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.

Anthony Neely is the Founder of EvalScribe, a veteran educator, an AI integration consultant for teaching & learning, researcher, & author.