Editorial cover on EvalScribe cream reading "Ten standards, four levels, and the growth goals Oregon kept," with three chips (4 domains, 10 standards; Level 3 = Proficient the bar; SLG goals still required) and a subhead noting the Oregon Framework runs on the InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards. Tagged for Oregon principals and evaluators.

AI for Oregon Teacher Evaluations

EvalScribe
July 01, 2026
Custom HTML/CSS/JavaScript
Oregon teacher evaluationOregon Model Core Teaching StandardsMCTSInTASC OregonORS 342.856ODE educator effectivenessSLG goals OregonStudent Learning and Growth OregonOregon Framework for EvaluationTeacher Standards and Practices CommissionTSPCAI for Oregon teacher evaluationai for oregon teacher evaluationsoregon teacher evaluationoregon framework for teacher and administrator evaluationmodel core teaching standardsInTASC standards oregonstudent learning and growth goals oregonSLG goals oregonis student growth required oregonoregon teacher performance levelshow are teachers evaluated in oregonbest AI tool for oregon teacher evaluationsis AI teacher feedback defensible
Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.

Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D.

Anthony Neely is the Founder of EvalScribe, a veteran educator, an AI integration consultant for teaching & learning, researcher, & author.

Back to Blog