EvalScribe for Illinois — AI-powered PERA teacher evaluations
Illinois · PERA (105 ILCS 24A)

AI-powered teacher evaluations
for Illinois educators.

Cut PERA documentation from hours to minutes. EvalScribe drafts professional-practice write-ups aligned to your district's instructional framework and Illinois's four rating categories — Excellent, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory.

EvalScribe app shown on iPhone resting on a laptop keyboard.
30–60 min

Saved per evaluation

4 ratings

Statewide rating categories

Your framework

Danielson, state model & more

100%

Evaluator-controlled ratings

Three evaluations free — no credit card · Individual plans from $100/year · School & district licensing available

Endorsed by educational leaders

Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.

Tobin Davidson · Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education

This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good.

Kittie Brown · Assistant Principal

Also endorsed by Dr. Robert Stinson · Glenn Brown · Angie Brandt — read full quotes ↓

Built by a classroom teacher

Founded by a practicing K–12 educator with nearly 20 years in the field.

Illinois-specific

Fits your district's PERA framework and Illinois's four rating categories.

Privacy-first

Transient processing on Microsoft Azure. Never used for AI training.

Built for workflow

Designed around the realities of being an Illinois evaluator.

The framework

Illinois evaluates under PERA. EvalScribe fits your district's framework.

Illinois evaluates teachers under the Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA), codified in Article 24A of the School Code (105 ILCS 5/24A) and 23 Ill. Admin. Code Part 50. Every teacher is rated in one of four statewide categories, using an instructional framework the district adopts through its PERA joint committee. There is no single mandated rubric — so EvalScribe drafts against whichever framework your district uses.

The framework requirement

What Illinois requires of the instructional framework.

PERA doesn't prescribe one rubric, but it does set the bar. A district's instructional framework must be research-based, must address at least these three areas, and must align with the Illinois Professional Teaching Standards. The framework is adopted through the district's PERA joint committee.

Planning

Preparation and instructional design before the lesson.

Instructional delivery

Teaching in action — how the lesson is carried out.

Classroom management

The environment, routines, and conditions for learning.

Instructional frameworks

The frameworks Illinois districts use

Within PERA's requirements, each district chooses its instructional framework. EvalScribe ships the ones Illinois districts commonly adopt, so it drafts the professional-practice write-up in the language of the framework your district selected.

Commonly adopted in Illinois.

1
The Framework for Teaching (Danielson)
Built in

Four domains — planning and preparation, the classroom environment, instruction, and professional responsibilities. By far the most widely adopted framework in Illinois.

2
ISBE State Model
Ask us

Illinois's optional state model framework, available for districts that adopt it rather than build their own.

3
A locally developed framework
Ask us

A district may develop or adapt its own framework, provided it is research-based, addresses planning, instructional delivery, and classroom management, and aligns with the Illinois Professional Teaching Standards. Not sure yours is covered? Just ask.

Illinois's four performance rating categories.

4

Excellent

3

Proficient

2

Needs Improvement

1

Unsatisfactory

These four categories are set statewide by PERA (105 ILCS 5/24A-5); every Illinois teacher receives one of them.

How EvalScribe handles Illinois PERA

Tell EvalScribe which instructional framework your district uses, and it drafts the professional-practice write-up in that framework's language — mapping the evidence from your notes to the relevant domain or standard and drafting ratings and feedback you review and finalize, toward the four categories (Excellent, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory). Because it ships the Danielson framework and other common models, EvalScribe fits your PERA plan rather than forcing a generic rubric onto it.

Student growth is now optional. Public Act 104-0020, signed June 30, 2025 and effective July 1, 2025, removed the requirement that teacher and principal evaluations include data and indicators of student growth as a factor. For a decade PERA had required student growth as a significant factor; now districts may include it if they choose, but they are no longer required to. Where a district still includes it, those measures are handled within its PERA plan, not by EvalScribe.

Scope of the score. EvalScribe drafts the professional-practice piece. The overall summative rating — and any student growth measures your district still elects to use — is determined by your district's PERA evaluation plan and joint committee, not the app. Confirm your district's adopted instructional framework and rating method; if it would help to see a specific framework supported, email [email protected].

The workflow

How EvalScribe works with your PERA framework.

A five-step path from the back of the classroom to a finished, standards-aligned evaluation.

1

Observe the classroom

Formal observation or walkthrough — capture what you see the way you always have.

2

Enter notes your way

Type, dictate, or snap a photo of your handwritten notes. Smart Scan converts handwriting to text.

3

Map evidence to your framework

EvalScribe identifies which domain or standard of your district's framework each note supports.

4

Suggested ratings & comments

Get draft ratings and feedback language in the rubric's own voice, across the four-level scale.

5

Review & finalize

Edit anything you want, finalize the evaluation, and export a clean PDF for your records.

EvalScribe shown side-by-side on a Mac and an iPhone, demonstrating cross-device support.

EvalScribe runs natively on iPhone, iPad, and Mac — work where you are.

Three ways in

Capture notes the way you already work.

No retraining required. Whatever your walkthrough style, EvalScribe accepts it.

EvalScribe input screen on iPhone showing capture options.

Snap a photo

Photograph your handwritten notes mid-walkthrough. Smart Scan OCR converts handwriting to text — even messy handwriting, even pedagogical terms.

Dictate as you go

Speak observations directly into the app. Voice dictation captures what you saw without breaking your eye contact with the classroom.

Type directly

Prefer to type? Enter notes straight into the app — they flow into the same DC-aware drafting pipeline as scans and dictation.

The difference

Why generic AI falls short for PERA.

Pasting your walkthrough notes into a general-purpose chatbot might produce a paragraph that sounds polished — but for PERA documentation, "sounds polished" isn't the bar. Defensible, framework-aligned evaluations are.

CapabilityGeneric AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.)EvalScribe
Framework awarenessNo concept of PERA or that Illinois districts each adopt their own instructional framework. Treats every prompt the same.Built around the frameworks Illinois districts actually use — the Danielson framework and more.
Framework matchingInvents domains and rubric language that don't match the framework your district adopted.Drafts in the language of your district's framework, using the actual rubric loaded into the app.
Local-control awarenessAssumes a single statewide rubric that PERA doesn't prescribe.Fits your district's PERA plan and Illinois's four statewide rating categories.
Student growth statusMay assume growth measures are required, missing that Illinois made them optional in 2025.Drafts the professional-practice piece; leaves any locally chosen growth measures to your PERA plan.
Rating categoriesDefaults to generic good-to-bad framing that doesn't match Illinois's categories.Drafts toward Illinois's four categories — Excellent, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory.
Note inputRequires you to retype everything before the AI can do anything with it.Accepts typed notes, dictation, or photos of handwritten notes via Smart Scan OCR.
Feedback languageVague, generic comments that could describe any teacher.Professional, evidence-anchored feedback written in the language of your district's framework.
Data privacyFree tiers may use your inputs to train public models.Enterprise-grade Microsoft Azure. Transient processing. Zero retention. Never used for training.
DefensibilityOutput you can't trace back to evidence or rubric language.Every comment is tied to evidence pulled from your notes and the component it supports.
Time saved

How much Illinois evaluation time could you reclaim?

Tune the inputs to your reality. The numbers update as you go.

Teachers you evaluate25
580
Observations per teacher per year3
110
Current minutes per write-up45min
2090

You could reclaim approximately

44

hours per year

5

Workdays reclaimed

75

Total evaluations

Based on early EvalScribe users saving an average of 35 minutes per evaluation. Individual results may vary based on your current workflow.

See it concretely

The best way to see it
is to watch it.

Reading about how EvalScribe drafts a PERA evaluation isn't the same as watching it happen. The demo walks through a real observation — capture, mapping, scoring, and final export — start to finish.

1.Observation notes captured by type, dictation, and Smart Scan.
2.Evidence mapped to the domains or standards of your district's framework.
3.Suggested performance-level ratings and drafted comments in the rubric's own language.
4.Final review, edits, and PDF export.
EvalScribe draft review screen showing a generated evaluation ready for review and edits.

The draft review screen — every comment, rating, and piece of mapped evidence is fully editable before export.

See an example EvalScribe report.

A real EvalScribe-generated evaluation, formatted exactly as it exports from the app. The workflow is the same across frameworks — useful to share with district stakeholders.

Download sample PDF
From educational leaders

What educational leaders are saying.

Real feedback from administrators across roles — from academic coaches to assistant superintendents.

Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.

Tobin Davidson

Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education

This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good. I look forward to using it on a regular basis next year.

Kittie Brown

Assistant Principal

Evaluators spend an inordinate amount of time recording and documenting evaluations. This app is easy to use, affordable, and incredibly efficient. It cuts the time spent recording and documenting evaluations down significantly and frees us up to handle other aspects of the job. Plus, the conference suggestions save on prep time when a conference is warranted.

Angie Brandt

Academic Coach

Who built it

Built by educators, for educators.

EvalScribe was co-founded by a practicing classroom teacher and his wife — a husband-and-wife team with thirty years of combined classroom and business experience.

Anthony Neely, Ph.D.

Anthony Neely, Ph.D.

Co-founder · Product

A tenured K–12 classroom teacher and Professional Learning Lead. District Teacher of the Year, with nearly 20 years in education and three published books.

Andrea Neely, Ph.D.

Andrea Neely, Ph.D.

Co-founder · Business

Associate Professor of Management. Research and teaching in organizational management.

Your evaluation data stays yours.

Observation notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on our servers. Your evaluation records live locally on your device. Notes and evaluations are never used to train public AI models. For districts needing a Data Processing Agreement or FERPA attestation, those are available on request.

Introductory pricing

Simple, transparent pricing.

Try EvalScribe with three free evaluations. When you're ready to keep going, pick the plan that fits your role.

Individual

For a single evaluator on their own device.

$100/year

Billed annually per user

  • Unlimited evaluations
  • All supported frameworks, including Illinois PERA frameworks
  • iOS & macOS access
  • 3 free evaluations to start
Start on the App Store

District-wide

For districts deploying across every evaluator.

$80/admin/year

Best value for full deployments

  • Everything in School-wide
  • 20% volume discount
  • Single access code for the entire district
  • Direct support contact for rollout
Request district pricing

All pricing shown is introductory and may change. For school and district plans, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that the buyer distributes to their evaluators.

Frequently asked

Illinois PERA & EvalScribe — common questions.

Does EvalScribe work with Illinois PERA evaluations?

Yes. Illinois doesn't mandate one rubric — each district adopts its own instructional framework under PERA through its joint committee. EvalScribe ships the frameworks Illinois districts commonly use (the Danielson framework and more), so it drafts the professional-practice write-up in the language of your district's framework, toward the four rating categories (Excellent, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory).

Is student growth still required in Illinois teacher evaluations?

No — not anymore. Public Act 104-0020, signed June 30, 2025 and effective July 1, 2025, removed the requirement that teacher and principal evaluations include data and indicators of student growth as a factor. For the previous decade PERA had required it as a significant factor. Districts may still include student growth if they choose, but they are no longer required to. Where a district does, it's handled within its PERA plan, not by EvalScribe.

Which instructional framework does my district use?

That's set by your district's PERA joint committee and must be research-based, address at least planning, instructional delivery, and classroom management, and align with the Illinois Professional Teaching Standards. Most Illinois districts use the Danielson Framework for Teaching; some use the ISBE state model or a locally developed framework. If you're unsure yours is supported, email [email protected].

What are Illinois's teacher evaluation ratings?

PERA sets four statewide rating categories: Excellent, Proficient, Needs Improvement, and Unsatisfactory (105 ILCS 5/24A-5). Every Illinois teacher receives one of these. How measures combine to reach a rating is determined by each district's approved PERA plan.

Does EvalScribe calculate my summative rating?

No. EvalScribe drafts the professional-practice piece — the evidence, ratings, and feedback against your district's framework. The overall summative rating, and any student growth measures your district still elects to use, are determined by its PERA evaluation plan and joint committee, not the app.

Does EvalScribe replace evaluator judgment?

No. EvalScribe drafts evidence-mapped evaluations and suggested ratings. The evaluator reviews, edits, and finalizes every document. The professional judgment is always yours — EvalScribe just removes the typing.

Can the generated evaluations be edited?

Yes, fully. Every comment, every rating, and every piece of mapped evidence inside a draft evaluation can be edited before you export the final PDF. You are always the last set of eyes on the document.

Is observation data stored?

Your notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on EvalScribe's servers. Your evaluation records sit locally on your device under a local-first architecture. Your data is never used to train public AI models. For more detail, see our Privacy Policy.

How is EvalScribe different from ChatGPT or Claude?

Generic AI tools have no built-in understanding of Illinois PERA or that every district adopts its own instructional framework. They invent standards, assume a statewide rubric that doesn't exist, and produce vague comments. EvalScribe is built around the frameworks Illinois districts actually use — and the evaluator workflow that surrounds them — from capture through final export.

Where can I read the official Illinois PERA sources?

The Illinois State Board of Education maintains the Educator Evaluations page. The governing law is Article 24A of the School Code (105 ILCS 5/24A), implemented by 23 Ill. Admin. Code Part 50, as amended by Public Act 104-0020.

Which other frameworks are supported?

EvalScribe ships with frameworks from all 50 states and Washington D.C., plus general models such as Danielson, Marzano, Stronge, CEL 5D+, NIET, and Kim Marshall. The complete list is available at evalscribe.com/frameworks.

Don't see your question? Reach out via our contact page — we read every message personally.

Lead your school

Spend less time on paperwork.
Lead your building.

EvalScribe was built to help Illinois evaluators spend less time documenting evaluations and more time doing what matters: leading instruction, coaching teachers, and walking buildings.

Three evaluations free — no credit card · Available on iPhone, iPad, and Mac

EvalScribe EvalScribe

The new standard in classroom observation tools. Built by educators, for educators.

EvalScribe™ is patent pending.
© 2026 EvalScribe, LLC. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: EvalScribe™ is a patent-pending independent educational technology tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE) or any government entity. References to the Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA), Article 24A of the School Code, the Illinois Professional Teaching Standards, and instructional frameworks such as the Danielson Framework for Teaching are for informational compatibility purposes only. Illinois evaluation plans are adopted locally through a PERA joint committee; districts should confirm their own adopted framework and rating method. EvalScribe drafts the professional-practice portion of an evaluation; the summative rating is determined by the district's PERA plan. All final evaluation content, scoring accuracy, and resulting employment decisions are the sole responsibility of the evaluator and the school district.