Your state's framework, ready out of the box.
EvalScribe ships with arguably the most comprehensive mobile library of teacher evaluation frameworks ever assembled — every U.S. state, plus the major national models.
Frameworks supported
States + D.C.
National models
Last updated: March 20, 2026
Your state's specific framework.
All 50 states plus Washington D.C. — search for yours below.
Cards with an arrow link to a dedicated framework page.
51 states & territories shown
Alabama Quality Teaching Standards
Alaska Teacher Standards
AZ Educator Proficiency
TESS
CSTP (2024)
CO Enumerated Teacher Rubric (2018–19)
Element Level
CCT Rubric for Effective Teaching (2017)
DTGSS Teacher Classroom Observation Framework
FEAPs
TKES
Hawaii EES (Adapted Framework)
Framework for Teaching
Danielson Framework
RISE 2.0
Iowa Teaching Standards (ITSC)
InTASC
KEEP
PGES (Danielson)
Compass (Legacy)
Louisiana Educator Rubric (Current LEADS)
Danielson Framework (2022)
Maine State T-PEPG Model (NBPTS-Based)
MD TPP (Danielson Framework)
MA Educator Evaluation
5D+ (Common Choice)
MCEE (Danielson 2022)
MN TDE (Danielson Framework)
Mississippi PGS
Missouri Teacher Standards (MEES)
MT-EPAS
NTPPS
NEPF (Instructional Practice Standards)
NH Model System (Danielson-Based)
AchieveNJ
ElevateNM
NYS Teaching Standards (STEPS)
NCEES
CP²R Teacher Evaluation Model
NDTSS (Danielson)
OTES 2.0
Oklahoma TLE (Tulsa Model)
Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards
Danielson Framework (Act 82)
RI Model – Teacher Professional Practice Rubric (2019)
SCTS 4.0 (TAP)
Framework for Teaching
Project Coach
TEAM
T-TESS
UTES (Utah Effective Teaching Standards)
VT Guidelines for Teacher Effectiveness (InTASC)
VDOE Teacher Performance Standards (2021)
TPEP (Danielson 2022)
DC LearnDC Model Teacher Evaluation Rubric (OSSE)
WV Educator Evaluation (2024 – Standards 1-5)
WI Educator Effectiveness (Danielson Framework)
WY Ch. 29 (Generic Template)
The major national frameworks.
The widely-adopted evaluation models used across hundreds of districts and dozens of states.
Danielson Framework
2022 edition
The most widely-adopted U.S. evaluation framework. Four domains: planning & preparation, classroom environment, instruction, professional responsibilities.
Marzano Focused
Teacher Evaluation Model
Research-based evaluation centered on instructional strategies, conditions for learning, and professional responsibilities.
Stronge TEPES
Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation
Seven performance standards covering professional knowledge, instruction, assessment, learning environment, and professionalism.
CEL 5D+
Full Indicator Version
University of Washington's five-dimension teacher evaluation rubric: purpose, student engagement, curriculum & pedagogy, assessment, and classroom environment.
NIET Standards
Teaching & Learning Rubric
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching evaluation rubric, used widely in TAP-aligned districts across the country.
Kim Marshall Rubric
2024 edition
Streamlined ten-domain rubric designed for shorter, more frequent classroom visits — emphasizing observable, evidence-based feedback.
Your framework's covered.
Now try EvalScribe.
Three evaluations free. No credit card. Every framework above is included in every plan.
Available on iPhone, iPad, and Mac
Don't see your district's framework?
We add new frameworks by request — including custom district rubrics.
About the frameworks listed above.
EvalScribe is an independent educational technology tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or approved by any state department of education, school district, government agency, or organization responsible for developing teacher evaluation frameworks.
References to specific evaluation frameworks, standards, rubrics, or systems (including but not limited to TKES, Danielson Framework, Marzano Focused Model, TAP/NIET, and other state or organizational models) are provided solely for compatibility and interoperability purposes so that users may draft notes and organize observations within the structure of the framework used by their school or district.
EvalScribe does not claim ownership of, rights to, or authorship of any evaluation framework, rubric, or standard referenced within the application. All frameworks, names, trademarks, and intellectual property remain the property of their respective owners and governing organizations.
The application functions only as an AI-assisted drafting and organizational tool that helps administrators generate observation notes aligned with frameworks they already use. EvalScribe does not reproduce official evaluation rubrics in full, replace official scoring systems, or act as an official evaluation platform for any state or organization.
All generated content is draft material intended to assist professional workflow. Final evaluation language, ratings, scoring accuracy, compliance with district or state policy, and any resulting employment decisions are solely the responsibility of the administrator and the employing school or district.
Use of EvalScribe does not grant users any license to proprietary frameworks, nor does it imply any partnership, authorization, or licensing relationship between EvalScribe and the creators of those frameworks.