EvalScribe for Rhode Island — AI-powered RI Model teacher evaluations
Rhode Island · RI Model

AI-powered teacher evaluations
for Rhode Island educators.

Cut evaluation documentation from hours to minutes. EvalScribe is built around the RI Model Teacher Professional Practice Rubric natively — the classroom observation tool, all eight components across Classroom Environment and Instruction, and the Ineffective to Highly Effective scale, in the rubric's own language.

EvalScribe app shown on iPhone resting on a laptop keyboard.
30–60 min

Saved per evaluation

8 components

Environment & Instruction, built in

4 ratings

Ineffective to Highly Effective

100%

Evaluator-controlled ratings

Three evaluations free — no credit card · Individual plans from $100/year · School & district licensing available

Endorsed by educational leaders

Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.

Tobin Davidson · Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education

This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good.

Kittie Brown · Assistant Principal

Also endorsed by Dr. Robert Stinson · Glenn Brown · Angie Brandt — read full quotes ↓

Built by a classroom teacher

Founded by a practicing K–12 educator with nearly 20 years in the field.

Rhode Island-specific

Both RI Model Professional Practice domains and all eight components, built in natively.

Privacy-first

Transient processing on Microsoft Azure. Never used for AI training.

Built for workflow

Designed around the realities of being a Rhode Island evaluator.

The framework

The RI Model Professional Practice Rubric. EvalScribe is built around all eight components.

The Rhode Island Model Evaluation & Support System is RIDE's statewide framework. A teacher's Final Effectiveness Rating combines three measures — Professional Practice, Professional Responsibilities, and Student Learning. EvalScribe is built around the Professional Practice Rubric, the classroom observation tool at the center of the model.

Rhode Island's observation rubric

The RI Model Teacher Professional Practice Rubric

Adapted from Charlotte Danielson's Framework for Teaching, the Professional Practice Rubric is a classroom observation tool with eight components organized into two domains — Classroom Environment and Instruction. Each component is scored after an observation, from Ineffective to Highly Effective. EvalScribe maps your observation evidence to the component it supports and drafts a rating and evidence-anchored feedback in the rubric's own language.

Two domains. Eight components.

2
Classroom Environment
4 components
  • 2a Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport
  • 2b Establishing a Culture for Learning
  • 2c Managing Classroom Procedures
  • 2d Managing Student Behavior
3
Instruction
4 components
  • 3a Communicating with Students
  • 3b Using Questioning/Prompts and Discussion
  • 3c Engaging Students in Learning
  • 3d Using Assessment in Instruction

The four RI Model ratings.

1

Ineffective

2

Developing

3

Effective

The professional standard
4

Highly Effective

Effective is the expected professional standard — consistent practice that works for students. Highly Effective adds that students take an active, self-directed role in sustaining the environment or their learning, and EvalScribe drafts to each level's own criteria.

The other measures and the observation cadence

Alongside Professional Practice, the RI Model scores Professional Responsibilities (rated holistically at the end of the year) and Student Learning (through Student Learning Objectives, Student Outcome Objectives, Student Learning Goals, or Embedded Practice). All three combine into the Final Effectiveness Rating.

Professional Practice components are scored after each observation, and up to six observation scores may be averaged. Under RIGL 16-12-11, a teacher rated Highly Effective is evaluated at most once every three years and a teacher rated Effective at most once every two, while non-tenured, Developing, and Ineffective educators receive a full evaluation. EvalScribe drafts the Professional Practice write-up; the other measures and the final rating are handled by the district.

How EvalScribe handles the RI Model

Both Professional Practice domains and all eight components are built into the tool, each with the rubric's own language across the four levels and the critical attributes and distinctions that separate adjacent ratings. EvalScribe maps the evidence from your observation notes to the component it supports and drafts best-fit ratings and evidence-anchored feedback — so the write-up is defensible, traceable back to what you observed, and ready to inform the Professional Practice score.

Scope of the score. EvalScribe drafts the observation-based Professional Practice Rubric. Professional Responsibilities, Student Learning, and the Final Effectiveness Rating are determined by the district under the RI Model, not the app.

Current with RIDE's system. EvalScribe uses the RI Model Teacher Professional Practice Rubric as it stands in RIDE's current edition. If your district layers additional local guidance onto the RI Model and you'd like to see it reflected, email [email protected].

The workflow

How EvalScribe works with the RI Model.

A five-step path from the back of the classroom to a finished, standards-aligned evaluation.

1

Observe the classroom

Formal observation or walkthrough — capture what you see the way you always have.

2

Enter notes your way

Type, dictate, or snap a photo of your handwritten notes. Smart Scan converts handwriting to text.

3

Map evidence to components

EvalScribe identifies which of the eight Professional Practice components each note supports, across both domains.

4

Suggested ratings & comments

Get draft ratings and feedback language in the rubric's own voice, across the four-level scale.

5

Review & finalize

Edit anything you want, finalize the evaluation, and export a clean PDF for your records.

EvalScribe shown side-by-side on a Mac and an iPhone, demonstrating cross-device support.

EvalScribe runs natively on iPhone, iPad, and Mac — work where you are.

Three ways in

Capture notes the way you already work.

No retraining required. Whatever your walkthrough style, EvalScribe accepts it.

EvalScribe input screen on iPhone showing capture options.

Snap a photo

Photograph your handwritten notes mid-walkthrough. Smart Scan OCR converts handwriting to text — even messy handwriting, even pedagogical terms.

Dictate as you go

Speak observations directly into the app. Voice dictation captures what you saw without breaking your eye contact with the classroom.

Type directly

Prefer to type? Enter notes straight into the app — they flow into the same DC-aware drafting pipeline as scans and dictation.

The difference

Why generic AI falls short for the RI Model.

Pasting your walkthrough notes into a general-purpose chatbot might produce a paragraph that sounds polished — but for RI Model documentation, "sounds polished" isn't the bar. Defensible, rubric-aligned evaluations are.

CapabilityGeneric AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.)EvalScribe
Framework awarenessNo concept of the RI Model, its eight Professional Practice components, or its four-level scale. Treats every prompt the same.Built around the RI Model rubric's actual components, Danielson-adapted language, and Ineffective to Highly Effective scale.
Component mappingInvents domain and component labels and rubric language that don't match the RI Model.Maps evidence to the real eight components (2a-2d, 3a-3d) using the actual rubric loaded into the app.
The Effective standardTreats the scale as generic good-to-bad, missing that Effective — not Highly Effective — is the professional standard.Drafts to the real RI Model bar — Effective is consistent, expected practice; Highly Effective requires student-driven evidence.
Scope of the scoreBlurs Professional Practice together with Professional Responsibilities and Student Learning.Drafts the Professional Practice observation and leaves the other measures and the final rating to the district.
Observation focusReaches for Danielson's planning and professional-responsibility domains that aren't part of the observation tool.Stays within the two observable domains — Classroom Environment and Instruction — the RI observation rubric actually scores.
Note inputRequires you to retype everything before the AI can do anything with it.Accepts typed notes, dictation, or photos of handwritten notes via Smart Scan OCR.
Feedback languageVague, generic comments that could describe any teacher.Professional, evidence-anchored feedback written in the language of the RI Model rubric.
Data privacyFree tiers may use your inputs to train public models.Enterprise-grade Microsoft Azure. Transient processing. Zero retention. Never used for training.
DefensibilityOutput you can't trace back to evidence or rubric language.Every comment is tied to evidence pulled from your notes and the component it supports.
Time saved

How much Rhode Island evaluation time could you reclaim?

Tune the inputs to your reality. The numbers update as you go.

Teachers you evaluate25
580
Observations per teacher per year3
110
Current minutes per write-up45min
2090

You could reclaim approximately

44

hours per year

5

Workdays reclaimed

75

Total evaluations

Based on early EvalScribe users saving an average of 35 minutes per evaluation. Individual results may vary based on your current workflow.

See it concretely

The best way to see it
is to watch it.

Reading about how EvalScribe drafts an RI Model evaluation isn't the same as watching it happen. The demo walks through a real observation — capture, mapping, scoring, and final export — start to finish.

1.Observation notes captured by type, dictation, and Smart Scan.
2.Evidence mapped to the relevant RI Model Professional Practice components.
3.Suggested performance-level ratings and drafted comments in the rubric's own language.
4.Final review, edits, and PDF export.
EvalScribe draft review screen showing a generated evaluation ready for review and edits.

The draft review screen — every comment, rating, and piece of mapped evidence is fully editable before export.

See an example EvalScribe report.

A real EvalScribe-generated evaluation, formatted exactly as it exports from the app. The workflow is the same across frameworks — useful to share with district stakeholders.

Download sample PDF
From educational leaders

What educational leaders are saying.

Real feedback from administrators across roles — from academic coaches to assistant superintendents.

Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.

Tobin Davidson

Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education

This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good. I look forward to using it on a regular basis next year.

Kittie Brown

Assistant Principal

Evaluators spend an inordinate amount of time recording and documenting evaluations. This app is easy to use, affordable, and incredibly efficient. It cuts the time spent recording and documenting evaluations down significantly and frees us up to handle other aspects of the job. Plus, the conference suggestions save on prep time when a conference is warranted.

Angie Brandt

Academic Coach

Who built it

Built by educators, for educators.

EvalScribe was co-founded by a practicing classroom teacher and his wife — a husband-and-wife team with thirty years of combined classroom and business experience.

Anthony Neely, Ph.D.

Anthony Neely, Ph.D.

Co-founder · Product

A tenured K–12 classroom teacher and Professional Learning Lead. District Teacher of the Year, with nearly 20 years in education and three published books.

Andrea Neely, Ph.D.

Andrea Neely, Ph.D.

Co-founder · Business

Associate Professor of Management. Research and teaching in organizational management.

Your evaluation data stays yours.

Observation notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on our servers. Your evaluation records live locally on your device. Notes and evaluations are never used to train public AI models. For districts needing a Data Processing Agreement or FERPA attestation, those are available on request.

Introductory pricing

Simple, transparent pricing.

Try EvalScribe with three free evaluations. When you're ready to keep going, pick the plan that fits your role.

Individual

For a single evaluator on their own device.

$100/year

Billed annually per user

  • Unlimited evaluations
  • All supported frameworks, including the RI Model
  • iOS & macOS access
  • 3 free evaluations to start
Start on the App Store

District-wide

For districts deploying across every evaluator.

$80/admin/year

Best value for full deployments

  • Everything in School-wide
  • 20% volume discount
  • Single access code for the entire district
  • Direct support contact for rollout
Request district pricing

All pricing shown is introductory and may change. For school and district plans, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that the buyer distributes to their evaluators.

Frequently asked

The RI Model & EvalScribe — common questions.

Does EvalScribe support the RI Model?

Yes, for the observation-based component. EvalScribe is built around the RI Model Teacher Professional Practice Rubric — the classroom observation tool — with both domains, Classroom Environment and Instruction, and all eight components (2a-2d, 3a-3d). It maps your observation evidence to the component it supports and drafts a rating and feedback across the four levels: Ineffective, Developing, Effective, Highly Effective.

What are the three RI Model measures?

A teacher's Final Effectiveness Rating combines Professional Practice (the observation rubric), Professional Responsibilities (rated holistically at year end), and Student Learning (through SLOs, SOOs, Student Learning Goals, or Embedded Practice). EvalScribe drafts the Professional Practice write-up; the other two measures and the final rating are determined by the district.

How many observations does Rhode Island require?

Professional Practice components are scored after each observation, and up to six observation scores may be averaged. Under RIGL 16-12-11, a teacher rated Highly Effective is evaluated at most once every three years and a teacher rated Effective at most once every two, while non-tenured, Developing, and Ineffective educators receive a full evaluation. EvalScribe drafts the written record for each observation.

Why does the rubric only cover two domains?

The RI Model Teacher Professional Practice Rubric is specifically a classroom observation tool, so it focuses on the two directly observable domains — Classroom Environment and Instruction — adapted from Danielson's Framework for Teaching. Planning and professional-responsibility evidence is captured through the separate Professional Responsibilities measure, not the observation rubric. EvalScribe follows the same structure.

Does EvalScribe produce the Final Effectiveness Rating?

No. EvalScribe drafts the observation write-up and best-fit ratings on the Professional Practice Rubric. The Final Effectiveness Rating combines Professional Practice with Professional Responsibilities and Student Learning and is determined by the district under the RI Model, not the app.

Does EvalScribe replace evaluator judgment?

No. EvalScribe drafts evidence-mapped evaluations and suggested ratings. The evaluator reviews, edits, and finalizes every document. The professional judgment is always yours — EvalScribe just removes the typing.

Can the generated evaluations be edited?

Yes, fully. Every comment, every rating, and every piece of mapped evidence inside a draft evaluation can be edited before you export the final PDF. You are always the last set of eyes on the document.

Is observation data stored?

Your notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on EvalScribe's servers. Your evaluation records sit locally on your device under a local-first architecture. Your data is never used to train public AI models. For more detail, see our Privacy Policy.

How is EvalScribe different from ChatGPT or Claude?

Generic AI tools have no built-in understanding of the RI Model. They invent components, reach for Danielson domains that aren't part of the observation tool, hand out Highly Effective freely, and produce vague comments that miss the level distinctions the rubric requires. EvalScribe is built around the RI Model Professional Practice Rubric's actual components and scale — and the evaluator workflow that surrounds it — from capture through final export.

Where can I read the official RI Model sources?

RIDE publishes the RI Model guidebook, the Teacher Professional Practice Rubric, and related resources on its RI Model Evaluation Resources page. The evaluation-frequency provisions are set in RIGL 16-12-11, and the system is built on the Rhode Island Professional Teaching Standards.

Which other frameworks are supported?

EvalScribe ships with frameworks from all 50 states and Washington D.C., plus general models such as Danielson, Marzano, Stronge, CEL 5D+, NIET, and Kim Marshall. The complete list is available at evalscribe.com/frameworks.

Don't see your question? Reach out via our contact page — we read every message personally.

Lead your school

Spend less time on paperwork.
Lead your building.

EvalScribe was built to help Rhode Island evaluators spend less time documenting evaluations and more time doing what matters: leading instruction, coaching teachers, and walking buildings.

Three evaluations free — no credit card · Available on iPhone, iPad, and Mac

EvalScribe EvalScribe

The new standard in classroom observation tools. Built by educators, for educators.

EvalScribe™ is patent pending.
© 2026 EvalScribe, LLC. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: EvalScribe™ is a patent-pending independent educational technology tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) or any government entity. References to the Rhode Island Model Evaluation & Support System, the Teacher Professional Practice Rubric, and the Rhode Island Professional Teaching Standards are for informational compatibility purposes only. EvalScribe drafts the observation-based Professional Practice Rubric; Professional Responsibilities, Student Learning, and the Final Effectiveness Rating are determined by the district. All final evaluation content, scoring accuracy, and resulting employment decisions are the sole responsibility of the evaluator and the school district.