Cut evaluation documentation from hours to minutes. EvalScribe is built around Wisconsin's Educator Effectiveness System — the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching, four domains, twenty-two components, and the four-level rating scale Wisconsin DPI requires.
Saved per evaluation
Built in natively
To capture notes
Evaluator-controlled ratings
Three evaluations free — no credit card · Individual plans from $100/year · School & district licensing available
Endorsed by educational leaders
Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.
Tobin Davidson · Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education
This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good.
Kittie Brown · Assistant Principal
Also endorsed by Dr. Robert Stinson · Glenn Brown · Angie Brandt — read full quotes ↓
Founded by a practicing K–12 educator with nearly 20 years in the field.
2022 Danielson Framework built in natively, with all 22 components and the actual four-level rubric.
Transient processing on Microsoft Azure. Never used for AI training.
Designed around the realities of being a Wisconsin EE System evaluator.
The Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System (EE System) is the framework Wisconsin uses for K-12 teacher and principal evaluation. Established under Wis. Stat. § 115.415 and administered by the Department of Public Instruction (DPI), the system has two parts: an educator practice component built on the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching, and a student outcomes component using Student/School Learning Objectives (SLOs). EvalScribe is built around the practice component exactly — four domains, twenty-two components, four-level rubric — and accommodates SLO documentation as part of the broader workflow.
The educator practice portion of the Wisconsin EE System uses the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching, which districts in the state model must implement starting with the 2024-25 school year. The framework is organized into four observable domains covering twenty-two components, each rated on a four-level performance rubric — Unsatisfactory, Basic, Proficient, Distinguished. Alongside the practice evaluation, every educator completes at least one Student/School Learning Objective (SLO) annually, which contributes to the overall summary evaluation.
Wisconsin EE System — quick facts
Unsatisfactory
Basic
Proficient
Distinguished
All four Danielson domains and all twenty-two components are built into the tool, with the four-level performance rubric applied through rubric-aware logic that distinguishes between adjacent levels the way Wisconsin's framework actually intends — particularly the Proficient-to-Distinguished distinction, where student ownership of learning begins to drive the lesson rather than the teacher's delivery alone. EvalScribe also accommodates Wisconsin districts using an alternative practice model under PI 47 equivalency, and supports SLO documentation as part of the broader evaluation workflow.
A five-step path from the back of the classroom to a finished, Danielson-aligned evaluation ready for the EE workflow.
Walkthrough or formal observation — capture what you see the way you always have.
Type, dictate, or snap a photo of your handwritten notes. Smart Scan converts handwriting to text.
EvalScribe identifies which of the 22 Danielson components each note supports across all four domains.
Get draft performance-level ratings and professional feedback language in the voice of the 2022 Danielson rubric.
Edit anything you want, finalize the evaluation, and export a clean PDF for your records.
EvalScribe runs natively on iPhone, iPad, and Mac — work where you are.
No retraining required. Whatever your walkthrough style, EvalScribe accepts it.
Photograph your handwritten notes mid-walkthrough. Smart Scan OCR converts handwriting to text — even messy handwriting, even pedagogical terms.
Speak observations directly into the app. Voice dictation captures what you saw without breaking your eye contact with the classroom.
Prefer to type? Enter notes straight into the app — they flow into the same Wisconsin EE-aware drafting pipeline as scans and dictation.
Pasting your walkthrough notes into a general-purpose chatbot might produce a paragraph that sounds polished — but for Wisconsin EE documentation, "sounds polished" isn't the bar. Defensible, Danielson-aligned evaluations are.
| Capability | Generic AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) | EvalScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Framework awareness | ✕No built-in understanding of the Wisconsin EE System or the 2022 Danielson Framework. Treats every prompt as a generic teaching evaluation. | ✓Built around Wisconsin EE specifically — 2022 Danielson Framework, four domains, twenty-two components, four-level rubric, all loaded. |
| Component mapping | ✕Hallucinates component numbers (1a, 2c, etc.) and invents rubric language that doesn't match the actual Danielson rubric Wisconsin uses. | ✓Maps evidence to the actual 22 components using the loaded 2022 Danielson rubric. |
| Rubric scoring | ✕Inconsistent ratings between teachers — and between sessions on the same teacher. | ✓Suggests Wisconsin EE-appropriate Unsatisfactory / Basic / Proficient / Distinguished ratings based on captured evidence. |
| Level distinctions | ✕Defaults to generic "good/great" framing that misses the Proficient-to-Distinguished distinction the Wisconsin EE rubric actually requires. | ✓Rubric-aware scoring that meaningfully distinguishes between adjacent performance levels in the Danielson rubric's own terms. |
| Note input | ✕Requires you to retype everything before the AI can do anything with it. | ✓Accepts typed notes, dictation, or photos of handwritten notes via Smart Scan OCR. |
| Feedback language | ✕Vague, generic comments that could describe any teacher. | ✓Professional, evidence-anchored feedback written in the voice of the 2022 Danielson rubric. |
| Evaluator workflow | ✕No concept of walkthroughs, formal observations, or pre/post conferences. | ✓Built around the actual evaluator workflow, from capture to final exported PDF. |
| Data privacy | ✕Free tiers may use your inputs to train public models. | ✓Enterprise-grade Microsoft Azure. Transient processing. Zero retention. Never used for training. |
| Defensibility | ✕Output you can't trace back to evidence or rubric language. | ✓Every comment is tied to evidence pulled from your notes and the Danielson component it supports. |
Tune the inputs to your reality. The numbers update as you go.
You could reclaim approximately
hours per year
Workdays reclaimed
Total evaluations
Based on early EvalScribe users saving an average of 35 minutes per evaluation. Individual results may vary based on your current workflow.
Reading about how EvalScribe drafts a Wisconsin EE evaluation isn't the same as watching it happen. The demo walks through a real observation — capture, mapping, scoring, and final export — start to finish.
The draft review screen — every comment, rating, and piece of mapped evidence is fully editable before export.
A real EvalScribe-generated evaluation, formatted exactly as it exports from the app. The workflow is the same across frameworks — useful to share with district stakeholders.
Download sample PDFReal feedback from administrators across roles — from academic coaches to assistant superintendents.
EvalScribe is a tool that every public school principal should use. This resource literally makes multiple people out of administrators, allowing them to focus their energies on precise observation analysis and quality feedback while leaving EvalScribe to handle the mechanics. This tool will remove virtually all of the drudgery from the classroom evaluation process and would represent an excellent use of school funds.
Dr. Robert Stinson
Principal
After seeing a detailed demonstration of EvalScribe, I came away very impressed with both the concept and the execution. The platform provides administrators with a practical way to quickly capture classroom observations and generate high-quality, customized feedback that remains aligned to their evaluation framework and local expectations. What stood out most was the balance between efficiency and quality. EvalScribe has the potential to reduce administrative workload while helping school leaders provide more timely and meaningful feedback to teachers — a tool with considerable promise for schools and districts.
Glenn Brown
Director of Student Services
Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.
Tobin Davidson
Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education
This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good. I look forward to using it on a regular basis next year.
Kittie Brown
Assistant Principal
Evaluators spend an inordinate amount of time recording and documenting evaluations. This app is easy to use, affordable, and incredibly efficient. It cuts the time spent recording and documenting evaluations down significantly and frees us up to handle other aspects of the job. Plus, the conference suggestions save on prep time when a conference is warranted.
Angie Brandt
Academic Coach
EvalScribe was co-founded by a practicing classroom teacher and his wife — a husband-and-wife team with thirty years of combined classroom and business experience.
Co-founder · Product
A tenured K–12 classroom teacher and Professional Learning Lead. District Teacher of the Year, with nearly 20 years in education and three published books.
Co-founder · Business
Associate Professor of Management. Research and teaching in organizational management.
Observation notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on our servers. Your evaluation records live locally on your device. Notes and evaluations are never used to train public AI models. For districts needing a Data Processing Agreement or FERPA attestation, those are available on request.
Try EvalScribe with three free evaluations. When you're ready to keep going, pick the plan that fits your role.
For a single evaluator on their own device.
Billed annually per user
For a school with multiple evaluators.
3+ evaluators
For districts deploying across every evaluator.
Best value for full deployments
All pricing shown is introductory and may change. For school and district plans, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that the buyer distributes to their evaluators.
Yes — the Wisconsin EE System practice component is built in natively. All four domains and twenty-two components of the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching, plus the four-level performance rubric (Unsatisfactory, Basic, Proficient, Distinguished), are loaded into the tool. EvalScribe maps observation evidence to the appropriate Danielson components and suggests rubric-aligned ratings and comments.
The official EE System guidance is maintained by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI). Primary sources:
DPI Educator Effectiveness home page
WI EE System Policy Guide (PDF)
Statutory authority: Wis. Stat. § 115.415 and Wis. Admin. Code Ch. PI 47.
EvalScribe is aligned to the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching — the version Wisconsin DPI requires state model districts to implement starting in the 2024-25 school year.
Wisconsin's EE System requires educators to complete at least one Student/School Learning Objective (SLO) annually as part of the student outcomes portion of the evaluation. EvalScribe handles the practice (Danielson) portion of the evaluation natively, and accommodates SLO documentation as part of the broader workflow. SLO authorship and goal-setting stay with the educator and evaluator — those are conversations and judgments, not documentation tasks AI should automate.
Yes. Wisconsin districts that have applied successfully through the PI 47 Equivalency Review Process to use an alternative practice model can still use EvalScribe. The tool supports multiple framework models beyond Danielson, including Marzano, Stronge, and others commonly approved under equivalency. If your district uses a specific alternative model, reach out to [email protected] and we'll confirm coverage.
No. EvalScribe drafts evidence-mapped evaluations and suggested performance-level ratings. The evaluator reviews, edits, and finalizes every document. The professional judgment is always yours — EvalScribe just removes the typing.
Yes, fully. Every comment, every rating, and every piece of mapped evidence inside a draft evaluation can be edited before you export the final PDF. You are always the last set of eyes on the document.
Yes. Brief walkthroughs, mini-observations, and full formal observations all flow through the same capture-and-draft pipeline, so the documentation produced is consistent across observation types within the EE cycle.
Wisconsin DPI ended its contract with Frontline Education at the end of the 2024-25 school year, and now provides free forms and templates that meet EE process requirements. EvalScribe is a separate tool from the record-keeping platform — it focuses specifically on the documentation translation work (capturing observation notes, mapping to Danielson, drafting ratings and comments). The final exported evaluation can be saved into whichever record-keeping system your district has adopted, whether that's DPI's free forms, a locally developed solution, or another platform.
Your notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on EvalScribe's servers. Your evaluation records sit locally on your device under a local-first architecture. Your data is never used to train public AI models. For more detail, see our Privacy Policy.
Generic AI tools have no built-in understanding of the Wisconsin EE System or the 2022 Danielson Framework. They invent component numbers that don't exist, score inconsistently, and produce vague comments that miss the Proficient-to-Distinguished distinction the rubric actually requires. EvalScribe is built around the actual Wisconsin EE structure and the Danielson rubric — and the evaluator workflow that surrounds it — from capture through final export.
Yes. Individual evaluators can download EvalScribe from the Apple App Store on both iOS and macOS, with a free trial that includes three evaluations.
Yes. School-wide licensing starts at three or more evaluators ($90/user/year), and district-wide licensing is $80/admin/year. When you order, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that you distribute to your evaluators — no separate provisioning required. Email [email protected] to get started.
EvalScribe ships with frameworks from all 50 states and Washington D.C., plus general models such as Danielson, Marzano, Stronge, CEL 5D+, NIET, and Kim Marshall. The complete list is available at evalscribe.com/frameworks.
Don't see your question? Reach out via our contact page — we read every message personally.
Page maintained by Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D. — practicing K–12 educator with nearly 20 years in the classroom, 2025–2026 Walker County Distinguished Teacher of the Year, and co-founder of EvalScribe. Framework details verified against current Wisconsin DPI source documents.
Page last reviewed: June 30, 2026
EvalScribe was built to help Wisconsin evaluators spend less time documenting EE evaluations and more time doing what matters: leading instruction, coaching teachers, and walking buildings.
Three evaluations free — no credit card · Available on iPhone, iPad, and Mac