EvalScribe for Wisconsin — AI-powered EE System teacher evaluations
Wisconsin · Educator Effectiveness System

AI-powered teacher evaluations
for Wisconsin educators.

Cut evaluation documentation from hours to minutes. EvalScribe is built around Wisconsin's Educator Effectiveness System — the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching, four domains, twenty-two components, and the four-level rating scale Wisconsin DPI requires.

EvalScribe app shown on iPhone resting on a laptop keyboard.
30–60 min

Saved per evaluation

WI EE

Built in natively

3 ways

To capture notes

100%

Evaluator-controlled ratings

Three evaluations free — no credit card · Individual plans from $100/year · School & district licensing available

Endorsed by educational leaders

Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.

Tobin Davidson · Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education

This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good.

Kittie Brown · Assistant Principal

Also endorsed by Dr. Robert Stinson · Glenn Brown · Angie Brandt — read full quotes ↓

Built by a classroom teacher

Founded by a practicing K–12 educator with nearly 20 years in the field.

Wisconsin EE aligned

2022 Danielson Framework built in natively, with all 22 components and the actual four-level rubric.

Privacy-first

Transient processing on Microsoft Azure. Never used for AI training.

Built for workflow

Designed around the realities of being a Wisconsin EE System evaluator.

The framework

Wisconsin's Educator Effectiveness System, handled natively.

The Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System (EE System) is the framework Wisconsin uses for K-12 teacher and principal evaluation. Established under Wis. Stat. § 115.415 and administered by the Department of Public Instruction (DPI), the system has two parts: an educator practice component built on the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching, and a student outcomes component using Student/School Learning Objectives (SLOs). EvalScribe is built around the practice component exactly — four domains, twenty-two components, four-level rubric — and accommodates SLO documentation as part of the broader workflow.

Wisconsin statewide framework

Wisconsin EE System — practice component (2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching)

The educator practice portion of the Wisconsin EE System uses the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching, which districts in the state model must implement starting with the 2024-25 school year. The framework is organized into four observable domains covering twenty-two components, each rated on a four-level performance rubric — Unsatisfactory, Basic, Proficient, Distinguished. Alongside the practice evaluation, every educator completes at least one Student/School Learning Objective (SLO) annually, which contributes to the overall summary evaluation.

Wisconsin EE System — quick facts

Framework name
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System (WI EE System)
Governing body
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI)
Statutory authority
Wis. Stat. § 115.415; Wis. Admin. Code Ch. PI 47
Foundation (practice)
2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching
Structure
4 domains, 22 components
Rating scale
4 levels — Unsatisfactory, Basic, Proficient, Distinguished
System parts
Educator practice (Danielson) + Student outcomes (SLOs)
Year established
2011-12 (Wisconsin Act 166)
Current framework version
2022 Danielson FfT, required statewide starting 2024-25

Four domains. Twenty-two components.

D1
Planning & Preparation
6 components
D2
Classroom Environment
5 components
D3
Instruction
5 components
D4
Professional Responsibilities
6 components

The four-level performance rubric.

Level 1

Unsatisfactory

Level 2

Basic

Level 3

Proficient

Level 4

Distinguished

How EvalScribe handles the Wisconsin EE System

All four Danielson domains and all twenty-two components are built into the tool, with the four-level performance rubric applied through rubric-aware logic that distinguishes between adjacent levels the way Wisconsin's framework actually intends — particularly the Proficient-to-Distinguished distinction, where student ownership of learning begins to drive the lesson rather than the teacher's delivery alone. EvalScribe also accommodates Wisconsin districts using an alternative practice model under PI 47 equivalency, and supports SLO documentation as part of the broader evaluation workflow.

The workflow

How EvalScribe works with Wisconsin EE.

A five-step path from the back of the classroom to a finished, Danielson-aligned evaluation ready for the EE workflow.

1

Observe the classroom

Walkthrough or formal observation — capture what you see the way you always have.

2

Enter notes your way

Type, dictate, or snap a photo of your handwritten notes. Smart Scan converts handwriting to text.

3

Map evidence to Wisconsin EE

EvalScribe identifies which of the 22 Danielson components each note supports across all four domains.

4

Suggested ratings & comments

Get draft performance-level ratings and professional feedback language in the voice of the 2022 Danielson rubric.

5

Review & finalize

Edit anything you want, finalize the evaluation, and export a clean PDF for your records.

EvalScribe shown side-by-side on a Mac and an iPhone, demonstrating cross-device support.

EvalScribe runs natively on iPhone, iPad, and Mac — work where you are.

Three ways in

Capture notes the way you already work.

No retraining required. Whatever your walkthrough style, EvalScribe accepts it.

EvalScribe input screen on iPhone showing capture options.

Snap a photo

Photograph your handwritten notes mid-walkthrough. Smart Scan OCR converts handwriting to text — even messy handwriting, even pedagogical terms.

Dictate as you go

Speak observations directly into the app. Voice dictation captures what you saw without breaking your eye contact with the classroom.

Type directly

Prefer to type? Enter notes straight into the app — they flow into the same Wisconsin EE-aware drafting pipeline as scans and dictation.

The difference

Why generic AI falls short for Wisconsin EE.

Pasting your walkthrough notes into a general-purpose chatbot might produce a paragraph that sounds polished — but for Wisconsin EE documentation, "sounds polished" isn't the bar. Defensible, Danielson-aligned evaluations are.

Capability Generic AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) EvalScribe
Framework awareness No built-in understanding of the Wisconsin EE System or the 2022 Danielson Framework. Treats every prompt as a generic teaching evaluation. Built around Wisconsin EE specifically — 2022 Danielson Framework, four domains, twenty-two components, four-level rubric, all loaded.
Component mapping Hallucinates component numbers (1a, 2c, etc.) and invents rubric language that doesn't match the actual Danielson rubric Wisconsin uses. Maps evidence to the actual 22 components using the loaded 2022 Danielson rubric.
Rubric scoring Inconsistent ratings between teachers — and between sessions on the same teacher. Suggests Wisconsin EE-appropriate Unsatisfactory / Basic / Proficient / Distinguished ratings based on captured evidence.
Level distinctions Defaults to generic "good/great" framing that misses the Proficient-to-Distinguished distinction the Wisconsin EE rubric actually requires. Rubric-aware scoring that meaningfully distinguishes between adjacent performance levels in the Danielson rubric's own terms.
Note input Requires you to retype everything before the AI can do anything with it. Accepts typed notes, dictation, or photos of handwritten notes via Smart Scan OCR.
Feedback language Vague, generic comments that could describe any teacher. Professional, evidence-anchored feedback written in the voice of the 2022 Danielson rubric.
Evaluator workflow No concept of walkthroughs, formal observations, or pre/post conferences. Built around the actual evaluator workflow, from capture to final exported PDF.
Data privacy Free tiers may use your inputs to train public models. Enterprise-grade Microsoft Azure. Transient processing. Zero retention. Never used for training.
Defensibility Output you can't trace back to evidence or rubric language. Every comment is tied to evidence pulled from your notes and the Danielson component it supports.
Time saved

How much Wisconsin EE evaluation time could you reclaim?

Tune the inputs to your reality. The numbers update as you go.

Teachers you evaluate 30
580
Observations per teacher per year 4
110
Current minutes per write-up 45min
2090

You could reclaim approximately

70

hours per year

9

Workdays reclaimed

120

Total evaluations

Based on early EvalScribe users saving an average of 35 minutes per evaluation. Individual results may vary based on your current workflow.

See it concretely

The best way to see it
is to watch it.

Reading about how EvalScribe drafts a Wisconsin EE evaluation isn't the same as watching it happen. The demo walks through a real observation — capture, mapping, scoring, and final export — start to finish.

1.Observation notes captured by type, dictation, and Smart Scan.
2.Evidence mapped to the relevant Danielson components across all four domains.
3.Suggested performance-level ratings and drafted comments in the 2022 Danielson rubric's voice.
4.Final review, edits, and PDF export.
EvalScribe draft review screen showing a generated evaluation ready for review and edits.

The draft review screen — every comment, rating, and piece of mapped evidence is fully editable before export.

See an example EvalScribe report.

A real EvalScribe-generated evaluation, formatted exactly as it exports from the app. The workflow is the same across frameworks — useful to share with district stakeholders.

Download sample PDF
From educational leaders

What educational leaders are saying.

Real feedback from administrators across roles — from academic coaches to assistant superintendents.

Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.

Tobin Davidson

Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education

This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good. I look forward to using it on a regular basis next year.

Kittie Brown

Assistant Principal

Evaluators spend an inordinate amount of time recording and documenting evaluations. This app is easy to use, affordable, and incredibly efficient. It cuts the time spent recording and documenting evaluations down significantly and frees us up to handle other aspects of the job. Plus, the conference suggestions save on prep time when a conference is warranted.

Angie Brandt

Academic Coach

Who built it

Built by educators, for educators.

EvalScribe was co-founded by a practicing classroom teacher and his wife — a husband-and-wife team with thirty years of combined classroom and business experience.

Anthony Neely, Ph.D.

Anthony Neely, Ph.D.

Co-founder · Product

A tenured K–12 classroom teacher and Professional Learning Lead. District Teacher of the Year, with nearly 20 years in education and three published books.

Andrea Neely, Ph.D.

Andrea Neely, Ph.D.

Co-founder · Business

Associate Professor of Management. Research and teaching in organizational management.

Your evaluation data stays yours.

Observation notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on our servers. Your evaluation records live locally on your device. Notes and evaluations are never used to train public AI models. For districts needing a Data Processing Agreement or FERPA attestation, those are available on request.

Introductory pricing

Simple, transparent pricing.

Try EvalScribe with three free evaluations. When you're ready to keep going, pick the plan that fits your role.

Individual

For a single evaluator on their own device.

$100 /year

Billed annually per user

  • Unlimited evaluations
  • All supported frameworks, including Wisconsin EE
  • iOS & macOS access
  • 3 free evaluations to start
Start on the App Store

District-wide

For districts deploying across every evaluator.

$80 /admin/year

Best value for full deployments

  • Everything in School-wide
  • 20% volume discount
  • Single access code for the entire district
  • Direct support contact for rollout
Request district pricing

All pricing shown is introductory and may change. For school and district plans, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that the buyer distributes to their evaluators.

Frequently asked

Wisconsin EE & EvalScribe — common questions.

Does EvalScribe support the Wisconsin EE System?

Yes — the Wisconsin EE System practice component is built in natively. All four domains and twenty-two components of the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching, plus the four-level performance rubric (Unsatisfactory, Basic, Proficient, Distinguished), are loaded into the tool. EvalScribe maps observation evidence to the appropriate Danielson components and suggests rubric-aligned ratings and comments.

Where can I read the official Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System guidance?

The official EE System guidance is maintained by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI). Primary sources:

DPI Educator Effectiveness home page
WI EE System Policy Guide (PDF)
Statutory authority: Wis. Stat. § 115.415 and Wis. Admin. Code Ch. PI 47.

Does EvalScribe use the 2022 Danielson Framework or the older 2013 version?

EvalScribe is aligned to the 2022 Danielson Framework for Teaching — the version Wisconsin DPI requires state model districts to implement starting in the 2024-25 school year.

Does EvalScribe support SLO documentation?

Wisconsin's EE System requires educators to complete at least one Student/School Learning Objective (SLO) annually as part of the student outcomes portion of the evaluation. EvalScribe handles the practice (Danielson) portion of the evaluation natively, and accommodates SLO documentation as part of the broader workflow. SLO authorship and goal-setting stay with the educator and evaluator — those are conversations and judgments, not documentation tasks AI should automate.

My district uses an alternative practice model under PI 47 equivalency. Will EvalScribe work for us?

Yes. Wisconsin districts that have applied successfully through the PI 47 Equivalency Review Process to use an alternative practice model can still use EvalScribe. The tool supports multiple framework models beyond Danielson, including Marzano, Stronge, and others commonly approved under equivalency. If your district uses a specific alternative model, reach out to [email protected] and we'll confirm coverage.

Does EvalScribe replace evaluator judgment?

No. EvalScribe drafts evidence-mapped evaluations and suggested performance-level ratings. The evaluator reviews, edits, and finalizes every document. The professional judgment is always yours — EvalScribe just removes the typing.

Can the generated EE evaluations be edited?

Yes, fully. Every comment, every rating, and every piece of mapped evidence inside a draft evaluation can be edited before you export the final PDF. You are always the last set of eyes on the document.

Does EvalScribe support walkthroughs as well as formal observations?

Yes. Brief walkthroughs, mini-observations, and full formal observations all flow through the same capture-and-draft pipeline, so the documentation produced is consistent across observation types within the EE cycle.

With DPI ending the Frontline contract for 2025-26, how does EvalScribe fit?

Wisconsin DPI ended its contract with Frontline Education at the end of the 2024-25 school year, and now provides free forms and templates that meet EE process requirements. EvalScribe is a separate tool from the record-keeping platform — it focuses specifically on the documentation translation work (capturing observation notes, mapping to Danielson, drafting ratings and comments). The final exported evaluation can be saved into whichever record-keeping system your district has adopted, whether that's DPI's free forms, a locally developed solution, or another platform.

Is observation data stored?

Your notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on EvalScribe's servers. Your evaluation records sit locally on your device under a local-first architecture. Your data is never used to train public AI models. For more detail, see our Privacy Policy.

How is EvalScribe different from ChatGPT or Claude?

Generic AI tools have no built-in understanding of the Wisconsin EE System or the 2022 Danielson Framework. They invent component numbers that don't exist, score inconsistently, and produce vague comments that miss the Proficient-to-Distinguished distinction the rubric actually requires. EvalScribe is built around the actual Wisconsin EE structure and the Danielson rubric — and the evaluator workflow that surrounds it — from capture through final export.

Is EvalScribe available for iOS and macOS?

Yes. Individual evaluators can download EvalScribe from the Apple App Store on both iOS and macOS, with a free trial that includes three evaluations.

Can schools or districts purchase licenses for multiple evaluators?

Yes. School-wide licensing starts at three or more evaluators ($90/user/year), and district-wide licensing is $80/admin/year. When you order, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that you distribute to your evaluators — no separate provisioning required. Email [email protected] to get started.

Which other state frameworks are supported?

EvalScribe ships with frameworks from all 50 states and Washington D.C., plus general models such as Danielson, Marzano, Stronge, CEL 5D+, NIET, and Kim Marshall. The complete list is available at evalscribe.com/frameworks.

Don't see your question? Reach out via our contact page — we read every message personally.

Page maintained by Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D. — practicing K–12 educator with nearly 20 years in the classroom, 2025–2026 Walker County Distinguished Teacher of the Year, and co-founder of EvalScribe. Framework details verified against current Wisconsin DPI source documents.

Page last reviewed: June 30, 2026

Lead your school

Spend less time on paperwork.
Lead your building.

EvalScribe was built to help Wisconsin evaluators spend less time documenting EE evaluations and more time doing what matters: leading instruction, coaching teachers, and walking buildings.

Three evaluations free — no credit card · Available on iPhone, iPad, and Mac

EvalScribe EvalScribe

The new standard in classroom observation tools. Built by educators, for educators.

EvalScribe™ is patent pending.
© 2026 EvalScribe, LLC. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: EvalScribe™ is a patent-pending independent educational technology tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, Charlotte Danielson, the Danielson Group, or any government entity. References to the Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System and the Danielson Framework for Teaching are for informational compatibility purposes only. EvalScribe is an AI-assisted drafting tool; all final evaluation content, scoring accuracy, and resulting employment decisions are the sole responsibility of the evaluator.