AI-powered teacher evaluations
for Wyoming educators.

Yes. EvalScribe ships with a Ch. 29-aligned generic template covering the six standards most Wyoming district evaluation systems include, scored on the four-level performance rating scale (Ineffective, Needs Improvement, Effective, Highly Effective). Because Wyoming districts each design their own SBE-approved evaluation system, the specific component language will vary district by district — EvalScribe's underlying rubric-aware logic is built to handle that variation.

The official Chapter 29 rules are maintained by the Wyoming Department of Education (WDE) and the Wyoming State Board of Education. Primary sources:

WDE Teacher & Leader Evaluation
Chapter 29 Rules (PDF)
Statutory authority: W.S. 21-2-304(b)(xv) and (xvi).

That's the way Wyoming works — every district designs its own SBE-approved evaluation system aligned to Ch. 29. EvalScribe's generic template covers the universal Ch. 29 standards (planning, delivery, assessment, environment, professional responsibilities, growth) that most districts include. For districts whose system uses different standard names, weights, or indicator language, the underlying rubric-aware logic still applies. If your district wants tighter alignment to its specific rubric, reach out to [email protected] and we'll talk through what that looks like.

No. EvalScribe drafts evidence-mapped evaluations and suggested performance-level ratings. The evaluator reviews, edits, and finalizes every document. The professional judgment is always yours — EvalScribe just removes the typing.

The 2019 revision of Ch. 29 (following HEA0061) removed the strict requirement that evaluations use student growth data measures, giving districts more flexibility in how they incorporate growth evidence. Many Wyoming district systems still include a student growth standard, which is why EvalScribe's generic template covers it. Whether your district uses growth measures, and how, is a district-level decision — EvalScribe accommodates either approach.

Yes, fully. Every comment, every rating, and every piece of mapped evidence inside a draft evaluation can be edited before you export the final PDF. You are always the last set of eyes on the document.

Yes. Brief walkthroughs and full formal observations both flow through the same capture-and-draft pipeline, so the documentation produced is consistent across observation types — regardless of how your district's specific system handles observation cycles.

Your notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on EvalScribe's servers. Your evaluation records sit locally on your device under a local-first architecture. Your data is never used to train public AI models. For more detail, see our Privacy Policy.

Generic AI tools have no built-in understanding of Wyoming Ch. 29 or the way Wyoming districts design their own evaluation systems. They invent standard names that don't exist, score inconsistently, and produce vague comments that miss the Effective-to-Highly-Effective distinction Wyoming districts require. EvalScribe is built around the actual Ch. 29 framework structure — and the evaluator workflow that surrounds it — from capture through final export.

Yes. Individual evaluators can download EvalScribe from the Apple App Store on both iOS and macOS, with a free trial that includes three evaluations.

Yes. School-wide licensing starts at three or more evaluators ($90/user/year), and district-wide licensing is $80/admin/year. When you order, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that you distribute to your evaluators — no separate provisioning required. Email [email protected] to get started.

EvalScribe ships with frameworks from all 50 states and Washington D.C., plus general models such as Danielson, Marzano, Stronge, CEL 5D+, NIET, and Kim Marshall. The complete list is available at evalscribe.com/frameworks.