EvalScribe for Oregon — AI-powered teacher evaluations
Oregon · Model Core Teaching Standards

AI-powered teacher evaluations
for Oregon educators.

Cut evaluation documentation from hours to minutes. EvalScribe is built around Oregon's Model Core Teaching Standards — the ten-standard rubric under ORS 342.856 that anchors every Oregon district's evaluation and support system.

EvalScribe app shown on iPhone resting on a laptop keyboard.
30–60 min

Saved per evaluation

MCTS

Built in natively

3 ways

To capture notes

100%

Evaluator-controlled ratings

Three evaluations free — no credit card · Individual plans from $100/year · School & district licensing available

Endorsed by educational leaders

Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.

Tobin Davidson · Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education

This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good.

Kittie Brown · Assistant Principal

Also endorsed by Dr. Robert Stinson · Glenn Brown · Angie Brandt — read full quotes ↓

Built by a classroom teacher

Founded by a practicing K–12 educator with nearly 20 years in the field.

Oregon-aligned

The Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards built in natively — all ten standards across four domains with the actual four-level rubric.

Privacy-first

Transient processing on Microsoft Azure. Never used for AI training.

Built for workflow

Designed around the realities of being an Oregon evaluator working through your district's evaluation and support system.

The framework

Oregon's Model Core Teaching Standards, handled natively.

Oregon's teacher evaluation system runs under ORS 342.856 and is administered by the Oregon Department of Education (ODE). Every district's evaluation and support system is grounded in the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards — Oregon's adoption of the InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards, organized into four domains and ten standards. EvalScribe is built around that structure exactly, ready for the observation-based portion of the evaluation your district actually uses.

Oregon statewide framework

Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards

The Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards define what Oregon teachers should know and be able to do to help every learner succeed. Grounded in the InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards developed by the Council of Chief State School Officers, Oregon's version emphasizes culturally responsive teaching, real-world application, and the state's distinctive Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goal-setting process. The framework organizes teaching practice into four domains covering ten standards, with a four-level rating scale.

Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards — quick facts

Framework name
Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards, within the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems
Governing body
Oregon Department of Education (ODE); Teacher Standards and Practices Commission (TSPC) handles licensure
Statutory authority
ORS 342.856 — Core teaching standards
Foundation
InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards (Council of Chief State School Officers)
Structure
4 domains, 10 standards
Rating scale
4 levels — Does Not Meet, Developing, Proficient, Exemplary
District flexibility
Districts design their own evaluation and support systems meeting Oregon Framework requirements; collaborative process between teachers and administrators
Required components
(A) Professional Practice, (B) Professional Responsibilities, (C) Student Learning and Growth (SLG)
Data collection
ODE Principal and Teacher Evaluation Data Collection (annual reporting)

Four domains. Ten standards.

A
The Learner and Learning
3 standards
  • Std 1: Learner Development
  • Std 2: Learning Differences
  • Std 3: Learning Environments
B
Content
2 standards
  • Std 4: Content Knowledge
  • Std 5: Application of Content
C
Instructional Practice
3 standards
  • Std 6: Assessment
  • Std 7: Planning for Instruction
  • Std 8: Instructional Strategies
D
Professional Responsibility
2 standards
  • Std 9: Professional Learning & Ethical Practice
  • Std 10: Leadership & Collaboration

The four-level rating scale.

Level 1

Does Not Meet

Level 2

Developing

Level 3

Proficient

Level 4

Exemplary

How EvalScribe handles Oregon's Model Core Teaching Standards

All ten Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards, organized across the four domains, are built into the tool. The four-level rating scale (Does Not Meet, Developing, Proficient, Exemplary) is applied with rubric-aware logic that distinguishes between adjacent levels the way Oregon's rubric actually intends — particularly the Proficient-to-Exemplary distinction, where instruction shifts from teacher-directed to student-driven and cultural responsiveness becomes an active instructional asset rather than a passive stance.

Oregon is a district-flexibility state: each district builds its own evaluation and support system that meets Oregon Framework requirements. What stays constant across every district is the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards structure — the ten-standard rubric anchoring your observation-based work. EvalScribe handles that observation write-up piece. The Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goal-setting process, which uses locally-selected measures collaboratively determined between teachers and administrators, remains the teacher and evaluator's own work — tracked against actual student data across the school year, per ODE's SLG Goal Quality Review Checklist process.

The workflow

How EvalScribe works in Oregon.

A five-step path from the back of the classroom to a finished, Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards-aligned observation write-up.

1

Observe the classroom

Walkthrough or formal observation — capture what you see the way you always have.

2

Enter notes your way

Type, dictate, or snap a photo of your handwritten notes. Smart Scan converts handwriting to text.

3

Map evidence to Oregon MCTS

EvalScribe identifies which of the ten Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards each note supports across all four domains.

4

Suggested ratings & comments

Get draft performance-level ratings and professional feedback language in the voice of the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards.

5

Review & finalize

Edit anything you want, finalize the evaluation, and export a clean PDF for your records.

EvalScribe shown side-by-side on a Mac and an iPhone, demonstrating cross-device support.

EvalScribe runs natively on iPhone, iPad, and Mac — work where you are.

Three ways in

Capture notes the way you already work.

No retraining required. Whatever your walkthrough style, EvalScribe accepts it.

EvalScribe input screen on iPhone showing capture options.

Snap a photo

Photograph your handwritten notes mid-walkthrough. Smart Scan OCR converts handwriting to text — even messy handwriting, even pedagogical terms.

Dictate as you go

Speak observations directly into the app. Voice dictation captures what you saw without breaking your eye contact with the classroom.

Type directly

Prefer to type? Enter notes straight into the app — they flow into the same Oregon-aware drafting pipeline as scans and dictation.

The difference

Why generic AI falls short for Oregon.

Pasting your observation notes into a general-purpose chatbot might produce a paragraph that sounds polished — but for Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards documentation, "sounds polished" isn't the bar. Defensible, standards-aligned evaluations that hold up in your district's evaluation and support system are.

Capability Generic AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) EvalScribe
Framework awareness No built-in understanding of the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards or their InTASC foundation. Built around Oregon MCTS specifically — four domains, ten standards, four-level rubric, all loaded.
Standard mapping Hallucinates standard numbers and invents rubric language that doesn't match the actual Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards. Maps evidence to the actual ten Oregon standards using the loaded rubric.
Rubric scoring Inconsistent ratings between teachers — and between sessions on the same teacher. Suggests Oregon-appropriate Does Not Meet / Developing / Proficient / Exemplary ratings based on captured evidence.
Level distinctions Defaults to generic "good/great" framing that misses the Proficient-to-Exemplary distinction Oregon actually requires — where cultural responsiveness becomes an active asset and students take ownership. Rubric-aware scoring that meaningfully distinguishes between adjacent performance levels in Oregon's own terms.
Note input Requires you to retype everything before the AI can do anything with it. Accepts typed notes, dictation, or photos of handwritten notes via Smart Scan OCR.
Feedback language Vague, generic comments that could describe any teacher. Professional, evidence-anchored feedback written in the voice of the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards.
Evaluator workflow No concept of walkthroughs, formal observations, or pre/post conferences. Built around the actual evaluator workflow, from capture to final exported PDF.
Data privacy Free tiers may use your inputs to train public models. Enterprise-grade Microsoft Azure. Transient processing. Zero retention. Never used for training.
Defensibility Output you can't trace back to evidence or rubric language. Every comment is tied to specific, observable evidence pulled from your notes and the Oregon standard it supports.
Time saved

How much Oregon evaluation time could you reclaim?

Tune the inputs to your reality. The numbers update as you go.

Teachers you evaluate 30
580
Observations per teacher per year 4
110
Current minutes per write-up 45min
2090

You could reclaim approximately

70

hours per year

9

Workdays reclaimed

120

Total evaluations

Based on early EvalScribe users saving an average of 35 minutes per evaluation. Individual results may vary based on your current workflow.

See it concretely

The best way to see it
is to watch it.

Reading about how EvalScribe drafts an Oregon evaluation isn't the same as watching it happen. The demo walks through a real observation — capture, mapping, scoring, and final export — start to finish.

1.Observation notes captured by type, dictation, and Smart Scan.
2.Evidence mapped to the relevant Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards across all four domains.
3.Suggested performance-level ratings and drafted comments in the Oregon rubric's voice.
4.Final review, edits, and PDF export.
EvalScribe draft review screen showing a generated evaluation ready for review and edits.

The draft review screen — every comment, rating, and piece of mapped evidence is fully editable before export.

See an example EvalScribe report.

A real EvalScribe-generated evaluation, formatted exactly as it exports from the app. The workflow is the same across frameworks — useful to share with district stakeholders.

Download sample PDF
From educational leaders

What educational leaders are saying.

Real feedback from administrators across roles — from academic coaches to assistant superintendents.

Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.

Tobin Davidson

Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education

This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good. I look forward to using it on a regular basis next year.

Kittie Brown

Assistant Principal

Evaluators spend an inordinate amount of time recording and documenting evaluations. This app is easy to use, affordable, and incredibly efficient. It cuts the time spent recording and documenting evaluations down significantly and frees us up to handle other aspects of the job. Plus, the conference suggestions save on prep time when a conference is warranted.

Angie Brandt

Academic Coach

Who built it

Built by educators, for educators.

EvalScribe was co-founded by a practicing classroom teacher and his wife — a husband-and-wife team with thirty years of combined classroom and business experience.

Anthony Neely, Ph.D.

Anthony Neely, Ph.D.

Co-founder · Product

A tenured K–12 classroom teacher and Professional Learning Lead. District Teacher of the Year, with nearly 20 years in education and three published books.

Andrea Neely, Ph.D.

Andrea Neely, Ph.D.

Co-founder · Business

Associate Professor of Management. Research and teaching in organizational management.

Your evaluation data stays yours.

Observation notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on our servers. Your evaluation records live locally on your device. Notes and evaluations are never used to train public AI models. For districts needing a Data Processing Agreement or FERPA attestation, those are available on request.

Introductory pricing

Simple, transparent pricing.

Try EvalScribe with three free evaluations. When you're ready to keep going, pick the plan that fits your role.

Individual

For a single evaluator on their own device.

$100 /year

Billed annually per user

  • Unlimited evaluations
  • All supported frameworks, including the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards
  • iOS & macOS access
  • 3 free evaluations to start
Start on the App Store

District-wide

For districts deploying across every evaluator.

$80 /admin/year

Best value for full deployments

  • Everything in School-wide
  • 20% volume discount
  • Single access code for the entire district
  • Direct support contact for rollout
Request district pricing

All pricing shown is introductory and may change. For school and district plans, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that the buyer distributes to their evaluators.

Frequently asked

Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards & EvalScribe — common questions.

Does EvalScribe support the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards?

Yes — the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards are built in natively. All four domains and all ten standards are loaded into the tool, along with the four-level rating scale Oregon actually uses (Does Not Meet, Developing, Proficient, Exemplary). EvalScribe maps observation evidence to the relevant Oregon standards and suggests rubric-aligned ratings and comments.

Where can I read the official Oregon Framework and Model Core Teaching Standards?
Does EvalScribe handle Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals?

EvalScribe is focused on the observation-based portion of Oregon evaluation — the framework-aligned documentation piece that eats the most evaluator time. Oregon's Student Learning and Growth goals are a separate process: teacher-driven, based on locally-selected measures determined collaboratively between teachers and administrators, tracked against actual student data across the school year, and scored per your district's chosen methodology under ODE's SLG Goal Quality Review Checklist. The SLG goal-setting, tracking, and scoring process stays outside the tool. What EvalScribe handles is the observation evidence to rubric-aligned narrative translation across the ten Model Core Teaching Standards.

My district's evaluation and support system looks different from other Oregon districts. Does EvalScribe still work?

Yes. Oregon's Framework requires every district to design its own evaluation and support system through a collaborative process between teachers and administrators, so observation cadence, measures for Student Learning and Growth, and summative scoring methods vary from one district to the next. What stays constant across districts is the underlying Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards — the ten standards across four domains, the four-level rating scale. EvalScribe handles the standards-aligned documentation for observation write-ups regardless of the specific system your district uses.

Does EvalScribe replace evaluator judgment?

No. EvalScribe drafts evidence-mapped evaluations and suggested performance-level ratings. The evaluator reviews, edits, and finalizes every document. The professional judgment stays with you — EvalScribe just removes the typing.

Is the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards the same as the InTASC Standards?

Oregon's Model Core Teaching Standards are Oregon's adoption of the InTASC (Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium) Model Core Teaching Standards developed by the Council of Chief State School Officers. The four-domain, ten-standard structure comes directly from the InTASC framework. Oregon adds its own emphases — culturally responsive teaching, community context, cross-disciplinary connections, and Student Learning and Growth goals — that shape how the standards apply in practice for Oregon evaluators.

Can the generated evaluations be edited?

Yes, fully. Every comment, every rating, and every piece of mapped evidence inside a draft evaluation can be edited before you export the final PDF or paste content into your district's evaluation management system.

Does EvalScribe support informal walkthroughs as well as formal observations?

Yes. Whatever your district's evaluation and support system calls the observation type — walkthroughs, formative observations, formal announced or unannounced observations, peer observations — EvalScribe handles them through the same capture-and-draft pipeline. Documentation across observation types stays consistent throughout the year.

Is observation data stored?

Your notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on EvalScribe's servers. Your evaluation records sit locally on your device under a local-first architecture. Your data is never used to train public AI models. For more detail, see our Privacy Policy.

How is EvalScribe different from ChatGPT or Claude?

Generic AI tools have no built-in understanding of the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards. They invent standard numbers, produce vague comments, and miss the Proficient-to-Exemplary distinction Oregon actually requires — where cultural responsiveness becomes an active instructional asset and students take ownership of their learning. EvalScribe is built around the actual ten Oregon standards and the district-flexibility workflow that surrounds them.

Is EvalScribe available for iOS and macOS?

Yes. Individual evaluators can download EvalScribe from the Apple App Store on both iOS and macOS, with a free trial that includes three evaluations.

Can schools or districts purchase licenses for multiple evaluators?

Yes. School-wide licensing starts at three or more evaluators ($90/user/year), and district-wide licensing is $80/admin/year. When you order, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that you distribute to your evaluators — no separate provisioning required. Email [email protected] to get started.

Which other state frameworks are supported?

EvalScribe ships with frameworks from all 50 states and Washington D.C., plus general models such as Danielson, Marzano, Stronge, CEL 5D+, NIET, and Kim Marshall. The complete list is available at evalscribe.com/frameworks.

Don't see your question? Reach out via our contact page — we read every message personally.

Page maintained by Anthony D. Neely, Ph.D. — practicing K–12 educator with nearly 20 years in the classroom, 2025–2026 Walker County Distinguished Teacher of the Year, and co-founder of EvalScribe. Framework details verified against current ODE source documents.

Page last reviewed: July 1, 2026

Lead your school

Spend less time on paperwork.
Lead your building.

EvalScribe was built to help Oregon evaluators spend less time documenting observations and more time doing what matters: leading instruction, coaching teachers, and walking buildings.

Three evaluations free — no credit card · Available on iPhone, iPad, and Mac

EvalScribe EvalScribe

The new standard in classroom observation tools. Built by educators, for educators.

EvalScribe™ is patent pending.
© 2026 EvalScribe, LLC. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: EvalScribe™ is a patent-pending independent educational technology tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Oregon Department of Education, the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission, or any government entity. References to the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards and the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems are for informational compatibility purposes only. EvalScribe is an AI-assisted drafting tool; all final evaluation content, scoring accuracy, and resulting employment decisions are the sole responsibility of the evaluator.