Cut evaluation documentation from hours to minutes. EvalScribe is built around the Utah Effective Teaching Standards (UETS) natively — all five standards and twenty elements — and adapts to your district's own rating scale.
Saved per evaluation
UETS, built in
Across all five standards
Evaluator-controlled ratings
Three evaluations free — no credit card · Individual plans from $100/year · School & district licensing available
Endorsed by educational leaders
Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.
Tobin Davidson · Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education
This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good.
Kittie Brown · Assistant Principal
Also endorsed by Dr. Robert Stinson · Glenn Brown · Angie Brandt — read full quotes ↓
Founded by a practicing K–12 educator with nearly 20 years in the field.
All five UETS standards and twenty elements, built in natively.
Transient processing on Microsoft Azure. Never used for AI training.
Designed around the realities of being a Utah evaluator.
The Utah Effective Teaching Standards (UETS) are the state's teaching standards, adopted by the USBE. Utah's teacher evaluation is locally run — each district builds its own system, aligned to the UETS. EvalScribe is built around all five standards and their elements, in the standards' own language.
The UETS describe effective practice across five standards and twenty elements, aligned to the InTASC national standards. They are the shared basis every Utah district's evaluation system builds on. EvalScribe maps your observation evidence to the standard and element it supports and drafts a rating and evidence-anchored feedback in the standards' own language.
Below Standard
Developing
Effective
The professional standardExemplary
Utah does not mandate a statewide rating scale — labels are set by each district. EvalScribe defaults to this four-level scale and adapts to your district's own labels; just let us know what they are.
Under Utah rule (R277-323, effective for 2024-2025), each district runs its own educator evaluation system, aligned to the UETS, and updates it within two years of any revision to the standards. The specific instrument, cadence, and rating labels are local decisions.
Academic growth is measured through formative assessment identified by the LEA, school, or educator. EvalScribe drafts the UETS-aligned observation write-up; the growth measure and the district's final rating are handled outside the app.
All five standards and all twenty elements are built into the tool, each with the standards' own language and the distinctions that separate stronger and weaker practice. EvalScribe maps the evidence from your observation notes to the standard and element it supports and drafts best-fit ratings and evidence-anchored feedback — so the write-up is defensible, traceable back to what you observed, and aligned to the UETS your district's system is built on.
Scope of the score. EvalScribe drafts the observation-based, UETS-aligned write-up. Your district's rating labels, cadence, academic-growth measure, and final determination are set locally under R277-323, not by the app — and EvalScribe adapts to your district's scale.
Current with Utah's standards. EvalScribe uses the UETS as adopted by the USBE. If your district uses its own rating labels or local guidance and you'd like to see it reflected, email [email protected].
A five-step path from the back of the classroom to a finished, standards-aligned evaluation.
Formal observation or walkthrough — capture what you see the way you always have.
Type, dictate, or snap a photo of your handwritten notes. Smart Scan converts handwriting to text.
EvalScribe identifies which UETS standard and element each note supports, across all five standards.
Get draft ratings and feedback language in the rubric's own voice, across the four-level scale.
Edit anything you want, finalize the evaluation, and export a clean PDF for your records.
EvalScribe runs natively on iPhone, iPad, and Mac — work where you are.
No retraining required. Whatever your walkthrough style, EvalScribe accepts it.
Photograph your handwritten notes mid-walkthrough. Smart Scan OCR converts handwriting to text — even messy handwriting, even pedagogical terms.
Speak observations directly into the app. Voice dictation captures what you saw without breaking your eye contact with the classroom.
Prefer to type? Enter notes straight into the app — they flow into the same DC-aware drafting pipeline as scans and dictation.
Pasting your walkthrough notes into a general-purpose chatbot might produce a paragraph that sounds polished — but for UETS documentation, "sounds polished" isn't the bar. Defensible, standards-aligned evaluations are.
| Capability | Generic AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) | EvalScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Framework awareness | ✕No concept of the UETS, its five standards, or its twenty elements. Treats every prompt the same. | ✓Built around the UETS's actual five standards, element language, and structure. |
| Standard mapping | ✕Invents standard and element labels that don't match the UETS. | ✓Maps evidence to the real UETS standards and elements (1.1-5.4) using the actual standards loaded into the app. |
| Local rating scales | ✕Assumes a fixed statewide scale, unaware Utah lets each district set its own labels. | ✓Defaults to a clear four-level scale and adapts to your district's own rating labels. |
| Standards vs. growth | ✕Blurs the observation write-up together with academic-growth data. | ✓Drafts the UETS-aligned write-up and leaves the local growth measure and final rating to the district. |
| Professional Responsibility depth | ✕Collapses the fifth standard's law, learning, communication, and ethics elements into vague generalities. | ✓Handles each Professional Responsibility element individually. |
| Note input | ✕Requires you to retype everything before the AI can do anything with it. | ✓Accepts typed notes, dictation, or photos of handwritten notes via Smart Scan OCR. |
| Feedback language | ✕Vague, generic comments that could describe any teacher. | ✓Professional, evidence-anchored feedback written in the language of the UETS. |
| Data privacy | ✕Free tiers may use your inputs to train public models. | ✓Enterprise-grade Microsoft Azure. Transient processing. Zero retention. Never used for training. |
| Defensibility | ✕Output you can't trace back to evidence or rubric language. | ✓Every comment is tied to evidence pulled from your notes and the component it supports. |
Tune the inputs to your reality. The numbers update as you go.
You could reclaim approximately
hours per year
Workdays reclaimed
Total evaluations
Based on early EvalScribe users saving an average of 35 minutes per evaluation. Individual results may vary based on your current workflow.
Reading about how EvalScribe drafts a UETS evaluation isn't the same as watching it happen. The demo walks through a real observation — capture, mapping, scoring, and final export — start to finish.
The draft review screen — every comment, rating, and piece of mapped evidence is fully editable before export.
A real EvalScribe-generated evaluation, formatted exactly as it exports from the app. The workflow is the same across frameworks — useful to share with district stakeholders.
Download sample PDFReal feedback from administrators across roles — from academic coaches to assistant superintendents.
EvalScribe is a tool that every public school principal should use. This resource literally makes multiple people out of administrators, allowing them to focus their energies on precise observation analysis and quality feedback while leaving EvalScribe to handle the mechanics. This tool will remove virtually all of the drudgery from the classroom evaluation process and would represent an excellent use of school funds.
Dr. Robert Stinson
Principal
After seeing a detailed demonstration of EvalScribe, I came away very impressed with both the concept and the execution. The platform provides administrators with a practical way to quickly capture classroom observations and generate high-quality, customized feedback that remains aligned to their evaluation framework and local expectations. What stood out most was the balance between efficiency and quality. EvalScribe has the potential to reduce administrative workload while helping school leaders provide more timely and meaningful feedback to teachers — a tool with considerable promise for schools and districts.
Glenn Brown
Director of Student Services
Game changer. Absolute game changer for school admin.
Tobin Davidson
Assistant Superintendent · 40+ years in education
This is amazing. I would pay lots of money for this. I’m serious — it’s crazy good. I look forward to using it on a regular basis next year.
Kittie Brown
Assistant Principal
Evaluators spend an inordinate amount of time recording and documenting evaluations. This app is easy to use, affordable, and incredibly efficient. It cuts the time spent recording and documenting evaluations down significantly and frees us up to handle other aspects of the job. Plus, the conference suggestions save on prep time when a conference is warranted.
Angie Brandt
Academic Coach
EvalScribe was co-founded by a practicing classroom teacher and his wife — a husband-and-wife team with thirty years of combined classroom and business experience.
Co-founder · Product
A tenured K–12 classroom teacher and Professional Learning Lead. District Teacher of the Year, with nearly 20 years in education and three published books.
Co-founder · Business
Associate Professor of Management. Research and teaching in organizational management.
Observation notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on our servers. Your evaluation records live locally on your device. Notes and evaluations are never used to train public AI models. For districts needing a Data Processing Agreement or FERPA attestation, those are available on request.
Try EvalScribe with three free evaluations. When you're ready to keep going, pick the plan that fits your role.
For a single evaluator on their own device.
Billed annually per user
For a school with multiple evaluators.
3+ evaluators
For districts deploying across every evaluator.
Best value for full deployments
All pricing shown is introductory and may change. For school and district plans, EvalScribe issues a unique access code that the buyer distributes to their evaluators.
Yes. EvalScribe is built around all five Utah Effective Teaching Standards — Learners and Learning, Instructional Design Clarity, Instructional Practice, Classroom Climate, and Professional Responsibility — and all twenty elements, with the standards' own language. It maps your observation evidence to the standard and element it supports and drafts a rating and feedback, adapting to your district's rating scale.
No. Utah's teacher evaluation is locally run. Under R277-323, each district builds its own educator evaluation system aligned to the UETS, and sets its own rating labels, cadence, and academic-growth measure. There is no state-mandated rating scale. EvalScribe defaults to a clear four-level scale and adapts to whatever labels your district uses.
Standard 1, Learners and Learning; Standard 2, Instructional Design Clarity; Standard 3, Instructional Practice; Standard 4, Classroom Climate; and Standard 5, Professional Responsibility. Each has four elements, for twenty in all. The standards are aligned to the InTASC national standards, and EvalScribe covers every one.
No. In Utah, academic growth is measured through formative assessment identified by the LEA, school, or educator — a local decision set through the district's process. EvalScribe drafts the UETS-aligned observation write-up; the growth measure and the district's final rating are handled outside the app.
Yes. Because Utah districts set their own scales, EvalScribe defaults to a four-level scale (Below Standard, Developing, Effective, Exemplary) and adapts to your district's labels. Tell us what your district uses at [email protected] and we'll reflect it.
No. EvalScribe drafts evidence-mapped evaluations and suggested ratings. The evaluator reviews, edits, and finalizes every document. The professional judgment is always yours — EvalScribe just removes the typing.
Yes, fully. Every comment, every rating, and every piece of mapped evidence inside a draft evaluation can be edited before you export the final PDF. You are always the last set of eyes on the document.
Your notes are processed transiently on Microsoft Azure and are not retained on EvalScribe's servers. Your evaluation records sit locally on your device under a local-first architecture. Your data is never used to train public AI models. For more detail, see our Privacy Policy.
Generic AI tools have no built-in understanding of the UETS. They invent standards and elements, assume a statewide rating scale Utah doesn't mandate, and produce vague comments that miss the distinctions the standards require. EvalScribe is built around the UETS's actual five standards and twenty elements — and the evaluator workflow that surrounds it — from capture through final export, adapting to your district's own scale.
The Utah State Board of Education publishes the Utah Effective Teaching Standards and the UETS Field Guide through its educator development resources. The rule governing local educator evaluation is R277-323, effective for the 2024-2025 school year.
EvalScribe ships with frameworks from all 50 states and Washington D.C., plus general models such as Danielson, Marzano, Stronge, CEL 5D+, NIET, and Kim Marshall. The complete list is available at evalscribe.com/frameworks.
Don't see your question? Reach out via our contact page — we read every message personally.
EvalScribe was built to help Utah evaluators spend less time documenting evaluations and more time doing what matters: leading instruction, coaching teachers, and walking buildings.
Three evaluations free — no credit card · Available on iPhone, iPad, and Mac